首页> 外文OA文献 >Securities Regulation: Seventh Circuit Holds That Withdrawable Capital Accounts Are Not Securities within the Meaning of the Exchange Act
【2h】

Securities Regulation: Seventh Circuit Holds That Withdrawable Capital Accounts Are Not Securities within the Meaning of the Exchange Act

机译:证券法规:第七巡回法院认为,根据《交易法》的规定,可提取资本帐户不是证券

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Relying upon legislative history and the particular characteristics of the accounts, the Seventh Circuit in Tcherepnin v. Knight held that withdrawable capital accounts in a savings and loan association are not \u22securities\u22 within the ambit of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act. This note explores the bases of the court\u27s decision and suggests an alternative resolution which both furthers the purposes of the Act and preserves traditional state regulatory power in the savings and loan area.
机译:根据立法历史和帐户的特定特征,Tcherepnin诉Knight一案的第七巡回法院认为,储蓄与贷款协会的可提取资本帐户不在《证券交易法》反欺诈条款的范围之内。本说明探讨了法院判决的依据,并提出了另一种解决方案,既可以促进该法的宗旨,又可以保留储蓄和贷款领域的传统国家监管权。

著录项

  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1967
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号